1 min read
Case Study: Purple
How Purple Reduced their Equipment Downtime by 54% With L2L
Purple's leadership knew that the most important factor in...
25 years of teaching and consulting maintenance process improvement has taught me one thing: Maintenance managers and maintenance organizations are always looking for the magic pill to cure the ill of reactive maintenance. This is where maintenance consulting companies have made a truckload of money with myriad of programs. These programs may include Physical Maintenance Analysis (PMA), Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), Conditioned Based Maintenance (CBM), and Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM), as well as others. It is Reliability Centered Maintenance that I would like to address in this article.
Now, let’s set things straight. As a Consultant and Account Manager for my clients, I spend my fair share of time at 35,000 feet, seeing the world through the windows of every type of commercial aircraft in the sky.
I fully acknowledge that Reliability Centered Maintenance was born in the aircraft industry and has led to the avoidance of hundreds if not thousands of potential disasters. For this I am grateful; and in this article, I am not talking about RCM used in its original and purest form.
But, what I will say is that there are circumstances and industries where the discussion and attempt to implement RCM is just flat-out wrong.
Reliability Centered Maintenance was developed as an engineering process to optimize reliability and reduce maintenance costs of commercial airliners. The sheer amount of data that is generated through millions of hours in flight-time has allowed these aviation engineers to pinpoint the hot spots over the years, allowing them to design and improve the maintenance process.
The RCM approach is best known for its continued monitoring of the equipment and analysis of the data to make adjustments and improvements to the equipment and its maintenance program.
The rub with RCM is that it's methodical in its approach to implementation and execution.
Because Reliability Centered Maintenance requires meticulous implementation and execution, it is often not the best approach for those organizations that find themselves in a constant battle of firefighting.
In other words, when the house is burning, it is impossible to have a discussion about how the house should be built for the best fire prevention.
But, I often hear in maintenance circles—and in the mouths of consultants—that RCM is the answer.
Here are a few reasons it is not:
So, don’t get me wrong, there are industries and scenarios when Reliability Centered Maintenance is the answer. And in those cases, you should pursue that course. But, if you are in a firefighting maintenance mode, here are a few suggestions:
If you have done all of the above, then Reliability Centered Maintenance may be the program for your company. But if you struggle to gain control of the current process, then RCM will only add complexity and misuse of resources needed to solve the problems at hand. L2L’s CloudDispatch is the perfect tool to help your organization out of firefighting maintenance mode, by helping identify immediately those issues affecting your shop floor right now.
Mar 4, 2021by Devin Baldwin
"If it's not on Facebook, it didn't happen." This statement is roughly equivalent to the more primitive variant: "If a...
What makes L2L so unique is the fact that the product was developed by real manufacturing users. People that truly understand the day-to-day issues and concerns that drive the production floor.