Written by: on

Layered Process Audits Explained: Understanding the LPA Framework and Implementation Steps

Read Time: 10 Minutes

Topics: ,

Table Of Contents

    Layered Process Audits (LPAs) are a cornerstone of quality assurance and operational excellence in the manufacturing sector. By systematically auditing processes at multiple organizational levels, LPAs ensure that everyone is aligned with an organization's quality and safety standards. 

    This guide offers a comprehensive look into the LPA framework, focusing on implementation steps, questions, and checklists tailored to specific manufacturing needs.

    What is a layered process audit?

    A Layered Process Audit (LPA) is a systematic, proactive auditing technique used in quality management that involves multiple layers of an organization. From frontline operators to top management, each level participates in frequent audits to ensure that all aspects of manufacturing processes meet predefined quality and safety standards. 

    The primary purpose of LPAs is to detect and eliminate deviations from standard procedures and potential defects as early as possible in the production process — before they turn into more significant quality issues or failures.

    LPAs regular and recursive nature allows for immediate feedback and correction, which leads to reduced defect rates, improved compliance, and enhanced operational efficiency

    The framework of layered process audits

    The LPA framework is not just about catching errors — it also aims at fostering a proactive culture of continuous improvement. Understanding its structure is key to effective implementation.

    Key components

    The following elements form the backbone of the audit process:

    • Checklists: Customized to specific areas and processes, checklists ensure that audits are thorough and standardized. They provide a clear set of expectations and metrics for evaluating processes.

    • Schedules: As with any recurring activity, LPAs require a schedule. The frequency of these audits will vary based on the criticality of different processes.

    • Reporting: Effective LPAs depend on clear, actionable reporting. Audit results should be documented and communicated to facilitate quick corrective action and ensure transparency and accountability.

    Levels and roles in the audit process

    A pyramid chart explaining different levels and roles in the layered process audit.

    Layered process audits encompass every layer of the organization, each with specific roles:

    • Operators: Typically perform daily audits focusing on immediate operational concerns and basic checklist adherence.

    • Supervisors: Conduct more detailed weekly audits to verify that corrective actions are taken and to monitor ongoing compliance with operational standards.

    • Managers: Carry out monthly audits to assess the efficacy of the quality systems, ensure alignment with strategic objectives, and audit reports to identify trends and systemic issues.

    • Top executives: Often engage in quarterly reviews of LPA outcomes to ensure that audit findings align with the company's strategic goals and provide the necessary resources for continuous improvement.

    Scope and frequency of layered process audits

    LPAs should cover all critical aspects of manufacturing operations, from incoming raw materials to final product testing. The scope may also include health and safety protocols and environmental compliance.

    The frequency of audits at each layer is based on the complexity and risk associated with the specific process. Higher-risk areas like assembly lines may require daily audits, while less critical processes like inventory management might be audited weekly or monthly. 

    It’s also not a bad idea to periodically review the audit frequency and the used checklists to ensure that the LPA remains relevant and effective as processes evolve and improve.

    Steps for implementing and conducting LPAs

    Implementing and conducting layered process audits effectively requires a structured approach that encompasses the setup, execution, and integration of audits into ongoing operations.

    A list of steps manufacturers can follow to implement layered process audits.

    Start by educating your leadership and management teams about LPAs. It’s crucial that they understand how they function, their benefits, and how they differ from traditional audits. This knowledge is essential for securing buy-in and support.

    After that, clearly define what you aim to achieve through your LPA program — this can be defect reduction, enhancing compliance with internal and external standards, or improving operational efficiency.

    Setting specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) objectives at this stage will guide the development of your LPA strategy and help measure its effectiveness down the line.

    2. Build the audit team and develop procedures

    Now is the time to assemble your LPA audit team. Your "Avengers" should include representatives from every level of the organization, such as line workers, supervisors, and managers. 

    This committee will be responsible for overseeing the LPA program, ensuring that it is effectively integrated into daily operations and that the findings are actively used to drive continuous improvement.

    Alongside the audit team, you’ll need to develop formal procedures for conducting layered process audits. This should include comprehensive guidelines that:

    • Detail the audit process

    • Specify who will perform the audits

    • Outline the frequency at which these audits will be performed. 

    Having proper guidelines is crucial as they provide a standardized approach to conducting LPAs, ensuring consistency and reliability in the audit results across all departments.

    3. Choose audit tools and create specific LPA checklists

    Since LPA is a recurring activity, it is important to streamline the execution as much as possible.

    The simplest way is to create specific checklists for different processes. These checklists should be specific enough to provide clear direction to auditors, but flexible enough to accommodate unexpected situations or issues that might arise during the audit. 

    For those who want to go a step further, they can purchase LPA software to further simplify the management, analysis, and reporting of the audit data. 

    Alternatively, you can use a connected workforce platform like L2L to schedule LPA audits, create needed checklists, and share findings with your team. You’ll get a solution that can do much more than that while keeping all of your manufacturing data within a single platform.

    4. Set the LPA schedule

    Establish how often audits should be conducted at each level of the organization. The frequency can vary based on the role and the criticality of the processes being audited. For example:

    • Line workers might conduct daily audits to catch issues in real time.

    • Supervisors might perform weekly reviews to oversee and ensure corrective actions are implemented. 

    • Higher management could conduct quarterly audits to assess overall compliance and effectiveness of the LPA system.

    To ensure LPAs do not disrupt regular operations, try to schedule audits during times that naturally fit into the existing workflow of each department.

    5. Train the team

    Each participant should understand their role in the LPA process — the individual responsibilities, the steps they need to follow, and the criteria they must evaluate.

    Plan for regular refresher training sessions to keep all team members' skills up to date and to integrate new methodologies or technologies into the process. Additionally, use these sessions to bring new employees up to speed on the organization’s audit practices and standards.

    6. Start conducting the audits

    Once the schedule and checklists are ready and your team knows what to do, you’re ready to start performing the audits.

    In the early days, it is crucial to regularly monitor the execution of the audits to ensure they are carried out as planned. This includes checking that audits are performed on schedule and that all auditors are following the established protocols.

    There will often be some kinks in the process that will need to be fleshed out.

    7. Analyze, report, and act on findings

    The effectiveness of layered process audits is largely determined by how the findings are handled. Here are some recommendations:

    • Set documentation guidelines: Establish a standardized method for documenting audit findings. This should include clear, concise descriptions of any issues, photographic evidence if applicable, and the context around the finding. Proper documentation is critical for tracking the history of compliance and issues and provides a foundation for discussions on improvements.

    • Take time to analyze the data: Utilize statistical tools and data analysis methods to review the audit data systematically. This analysis should aim to identify patterns and trends that could indicate underlying process issues. For example, repeated non-conformities in certain areas might suggest a need for retraining or process reevaluation.

    • Communicate effectively: Ensure that the findings are communicated clearly and promptly to all relevant stakeholders. This communication should include both the good and the areas needing attention, fostering an environment of transparency and open dialogue about improvements.

    • Create actionable plans for improvement: Develop corrective action plans based on audit findings. These plans should assign clear responsibilities and deadlines for addressing the issues identified. It's important that these actions are measurable and targeted to ensure they effectively resolve the issues.

    • Implement follow-ups: Implement a mechanism to check on the progress of corrective actions. This follow-up is crucial to ensure that actions are not only implemented but are also effective in eliminating the root cause of the issues.

    8. Integrate LPAs into your continuous improvement strategy

    There are several ways in which LPAs can feed into your larger continuous improvement efforts.

    The simplest approach is to establish a feedback loop where insights gained from LPAs are systematically reviewed and used to inform strategic decisions. This involves not just correcting deficiencies but also recognizing areas where processes can be redesigned or enhanced for greater efficiency or quality.

    Furthermore, you can involve cross-functional teams in the review and action planning stages of LPAs. Having different perspectives will ensure that solutions are comprehensive and address the root causes rather than just the symptoms.

    Lastly, if you’re focusing on any continuous improvement initiatives like Six Sigma or lean manufacturing, incorporate LPAs as one of its underlying strategies. 

    An example of a layered process audit

    To illustrate the potential of layered process audits, let's introduce an example.

    Imagine a major automotive manufacturer that implements LPAs to enhance the quality of its assembly line, particularly in the final assembly of the vehicle's braking system, a critical safety component.

    Here’s what the implementation process and potential outcomes could look like:

    Phase 1: Initial assessment:

    • Objective: Identify recurring quality issues in the braking system assembly that led to increased rework rates and customer complaints.

    • Action: Conducted a baseline audit using a detailed checklist focused on each step of the braking system assembly.

    Phase 2: Conducting LPAs:

    • Operators' daily checks: Operators started with daily audits focusing on immediate checks, such as the correct fitting of brake pads and proper installation of brake lines. Simple checklists were used to verify each component’s installation as per the design specifications.

    • Supervisors' weekly reviews: Supervisors conducted weekly audits to review the findings of the daily audits, ensure corrective actions were implemented, and verify that all assembly procedures followed safety standards and design specifications.

    • Management's monthly analysis: Management reviewed monthly audit reports to assess the trend of issues, the effectiveness of the corrective actions, and any need for further training or adjustments in the assembly process.

    Phase 3: Reporting and improvements:

    • Data compilation and analysis: Collected data from all levels was analyzed to identify patterns, such as frequent misalignment of the brake caliper mounting bracket.

    • Corrective actions: Adjustments were made in the training program for new employees focusing more on the areas where frequent errors were recorded. Additionally, modifications were made to the workstation layout to better accommodate the assembly tools and components.

    • Feedback loop: Established a continuous feedback loop where operators could report potential issues in real time, leading to quicker responses and adjustments.

    The outcomes:

    • Within six months of implementing LPAs, the defect rate in the braking system assembly line decreased by 30%.

    • The streamlined process and reduced error rate led to a significant reduction in rework and associated costs.

    • Operators felt more involved in the quality assurance process, leading to higher job satisfaction and further improving the quality of work.

    While these aren't real-life examples, all of the case studies and experiences from our customers mirror these results and sentiments.

    Layered process audit questions and checklists for manufacturers

    Layered process audit questions are specially designed queries used during the audit process to ensure that manufacturing operations comply with established standards and procedures. In other words, they form the core part of LPA checklists.

    An example of a layered process audit checklist form.

    Here are some tips for writing LPA questions:

    • Be clear and concise: Questions should be straightforward and avoid ambiguity. Clear questions lead to clear answers, which are crucial for accurate audits.

    • Be specific: Tailor questions to specific processes or areas within the manufacturing line. Specificity helps in pinpointing issues more effectively.

    • Include a mix of question types: Yes/no questions can confirm basic compliance, multiple-choice questions can assess adherence to standard procedures, and open-ended questions can provide insight into why certain anomalies occur.

    • Focus on critical control points: Prioritize questions around critical aspects of the manufacturing process that directly impact product quality and safety.

    • Encourage observational answers: Design questions that require auditors to make observations rather than rely on subjective judgment. This approach reduces bias and increases the reliability of the data collected.

    And here is how to use LPA questions to build effective layered process audit checklists:

    • Organize questions logically: Group questions in a way that mirrors the workflow of the process being audited. A sequential order makes the checklist easier to follow and ensures that nothing is overlooked during the audit.

    • Incorporate standard responses: For each question, provide a set of standard acceptable responses where applicable. This standardization helps you compare results over time and across different auditors.

    • Leave space for notes and observations: Checklists should allow for additional comments or observations so auditors can report unusual or unexpected findings that might not be covered by the standard questions.

    • Include verification points: Add points in the checklist where auditors can verify the implementation of previous corrective actions. This ensures that each LPA builds on the last, reinforcing improvements and compliance.

    • Pilot the checklist: Before full implementation, pilot the checklist in a small section of the manufacturing process. This trial run will help identify any gaps in the questions or the flow of the checklist and allow for necessary adjustments.

    • Review and revise regularly: Regularly review the effectiveness of the checklist and make revisions based on auditor feedback, changes in manufacturing processes, or new compliance requirements. 

    By following these guidelines, manufacturers can ensure that their LPAs are robust, targeted, and effective.

    Streamline layered process audits with L2L

    The L2L Connected Workforce Platform offers a powerful solution for companies looking to optimize manufacturing operations and implement continuous improvement strategies like layered process audits. 

    By digitizing the LPA process, companies can schedule, automate, monitor, and analyze their audits more effectively. With L2L, manufacturers can: 

    • Create and distribute digital checklists that can be easily updated and accessed by auditors in real time on the factory floor.

    • Schedule audits directly within the platform, which then automatically notifies the relevant personnel when an audit is due.

    • Use mobile devices to perform the audits, speeding up the process.

    • Quickly generate detailed reports based on the data collected during the audit. 

    • Send real-time alerts to relevant stakeholders if an audit uncovers a critical issue

    • Keep all of the data in one place where teams can discuss audit findings, share feedback, and coordinate action plans.

    • Track the implementation of corrective actions.

    • Standardize LPAs across multiple locations and facilities, helping maintain uniform quality and compliance standards.

    • Maintain thorough documentation needed for compliance, storing all data securely in the cloud for easy access during external audits or reviews.

    By leveraging L2L’s capabilities, manufacturers can transform LPAs into a dynamic yet easy-to-use tool for driving operational excellence.

    Learn more by scheduling a product demo or reaching out to sales@l2l.com.